Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Phillips v. Neisen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 6, 1928No. 26,466PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Appeal from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial and from a judgment entered in a mandamus proceeding wherein defendants, county officials, at the instance of relators, taxpayers, were directed to publish the 1926 county financial statement as required by G. S. 1923, § 667.

The statute requires the financial statement to be made annually on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in January, and the publication thereof for three successive weeks, within 30 days thereafter, in some newspaper in the county.

1. The 30-day period expired before the commencement of this action. A…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Ex Parte HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. State ex rel. Lum v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. State ex rel. Arthurs v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State ex rel. New York Life Insurance v. PhilipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cross v. Board of Land CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Manco of Fairmont, Inc. v. Town Board of Rock Dell TownshipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. Barnes v. TauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Powell v. Township of CarlosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Ebenezer Society v. Minnesota State Board of HealthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API