Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. England

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 12, 1942No. 14151PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reid, Chief Justice.

1. It may be stated at the outset that the character of the restriction to be dealt with is not here involved. The correctness of the judge’s ruling in granting the injunction turns upon whether there was in fact a restriction by the grantor and whether the grantee, Atkinson, had notice of it. The efforts by the joint owners by their covenant in writing to establish a restriction is not important, except for a recital in it which has been quoted and will later be mentioned. This is true because Atkinson’s grantor was not a party to it. She undertook to convey to him a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Rosen v. WolffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Hancock v. GummSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Everett v. TaborSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Hill v. TriggTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Jones v. Lanier Development Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wardlaw v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Dooley v. Savannah Bank Trust CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  3. England v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Kilby v. SawtellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  5. Reid v. Standard Oil Co. of Kentucky, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API