Legal Opinion

Wardlaw v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 8, 1945No. 15058PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Presiding Justice.

Only the second division of the syllabus seems to require any further elaboration. Where the owner of realty sells a portion thereof, imposing on his vendee restrictions relating to the use of the estate conveyed, thus creating a covenant running with the land, there is a presumption, in the absence of any facts and circumstances showing a contrary intent, that the restriction is imposed for the benefit of the land retained, with the result that an implied inhibition is created as to the use of the portion ^of the land conveyed, for the benefit of the unsold…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peck v. ConwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Coughlin v. BarkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Watrous v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Deeves v. ConstableAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Meaney v. StorkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Oxford v. ShumanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Dooley v. Savannah Bank Trust CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  3. Womack v. Central Georgia Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. Pierce v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  5. Spencer v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API