Legal Opinion

Dooley v. Savannah Bank Trust Company

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 6, 1945No. 15103, 15117PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Chief Justice.

The two writs of error, being similar with respect to the questions raised, will be dealt with in one opinion.

There is no contention that the petition did not state a cause of action, or even that the plaintiff did not prove its ease as laid; the only' questions for determination being those raised by the motion to strike the alleged defenses.

There were two amendments to the plaintiff’s petition, but the contents of these amendments have not been and need not be stated. The defendants had already filed their answers, and were not required to reply to these amendments.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Corrigan v. BuckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  3. Rowland v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Osius v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Prime Bank v. GallerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  3. Stanley v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. Rowland v. KellosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  5. White v. LegodaisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API