Kilby v. Sawtell
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Justice.
1. Where an owner of land subdivides it into lots for the purpose of sale, under a general plan or scheme restricting the lots to certain uses, restrictions that are embodied in such general plan or scheme may in a proper case be imposed upon the lots beyond the express restrictions contained in the deeds to the purchasers, on the theory of implied covenants. Phillip's v. Ingram, 163 Ga. 581 (1), 586 (136 S. E. 785).
2. “The usual implied covenant is based on an actual pre-existing plat and subdivision, on the theory that the fact of making the plat, and formulating a set of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hancock v. GummSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Westbrook v. ComerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Wardlaw v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Deaton v. SwansonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Jones v. Lanier Development Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Horace Case v. Arthur E. MorrisetteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Roth v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Spencer v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Reid v. Standard Oil Co. of Kentucky, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Taylor v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.