Reid v. Standard Oil Co. of Kentucky, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Judge.
“As a general rule, the owner of land in fee has the right to use the property for any lawful purpose, and any claim that there are restrictions upon such use must be clearly established. Limitations or restrictions by implication are not favored, and must be strictly construed.” Thompson v. Glenwood Community Club, 191 Ga. 196 (1) (12 SE2d 623); Jordan v. Orr, 209 Ga. 161 (1a) (71 SE2d 206) and cit. Where it is sought to impose or enforce restrictions on the use or alienation of property, a preponderance of evidence is not sufficient, but the existence and validity of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- EDWARDS v. SurrattSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- Craven County v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Wardlaw v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Jones v. Lanier Development Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Humphrey v. . BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lanier v. BurnetteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Roth v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Matthews v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1981
- White v. LegodaisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Bales v. DuncanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.