Legal Opinion
In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits in the City of Mounds View
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 3, 2003No. C0-01-1695, C5-01-1708Published
1Opinion of the Court
664 N.W.2d 1 (2003)
In the Matter of the DENIAL OF ELLER MEDIA COMPANY'S APPLICATIONS FOR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DEVICE PERMITS IN the CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, Minnesota.
Nos. C0-01-1695, C5-01-1708.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
July 3, 2003.
Amy V. Kvalseth, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, for Appellant.
Marvin A. Liszt, Bernick and Lifson, P.A., Karen R. Cole, Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Minneapolis, for Respondents.
Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
Appellant Minnesota Department of Transportation denied Respondent Eller Media Company's application…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Arvig Telephone Co. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.