Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits in the City of Mounds View

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 2003No. C0-01-1695, C5-01-1708Published

1DissentHanson, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The City’s proposal to place revenue-generating bill*11boards adjacent to Highway 10 on The Bridges Golf Course is an innovative solution to serious budgetary concerns. It appears to have been chosen after due consideration of all relevant policy interests, including those of highway convenience, safety and beautification. Because municipalities have the authority to allow billboards within their boundaries, except as restricted by federal and state law, I would conclude as a matter of law that (1) a public golf course that is operated to make a profit is a “business,”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Arvig Telephone Co. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. State Ex Rel. Rochester Ass'n of Neighborhoods v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device PermitsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API