Legal Opinion
Do v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 12, 2019No. SC19722PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
Under General Statutes § 14-227b(c), 1 anytime someone is arrested for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of drugs or intoxicating liquor and refuses to submit to or fails a blood, breath or urine test, the arresting officer must, among other things, prepare a report of the incident for the Department of Motor Vehicles (department), and, pursuant to § 14-227b-19 of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies, 2 that report is admissible at a hearing to suspend an operator's license conducted in accordance with § 14-227b (g), 3 as long as it conforms to the requirements of §…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Buckley v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Gianetti v. Norwalk HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Glanz v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Connecticut Fine Wine & Spirits, LLC v. Dept. of Consumer Protection, Liquor Control CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Assn. v. VirgulakConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Jake Ratches v. Tony Guerrera, et al.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
- Kiyak v. Dept. of AgricultureConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.