Provensal v. Michel
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, J., pro tem.
—This is an action in equity wherein plaintiff seeks to have set aside and declared of no effect a certain conveyance of real estate executed by her to defendant Joseph Michel. The property in question since the original transfer has been conveyed to other parties defendant. Prom a judgment in favor of defendants the plaintiff presents this appeal.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff was and is a widow, with little knowledge of the English language and having no familiarity with business transactions; that Joseph Michel, a trusted friend of plaintiff and her deceased…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Loftus v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Fitts v. Mission Health & Beauty ShopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Curns v. BrannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Garin v. PeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
3Cited by1 opinion
- K. King and G. Shuler Corp. v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968