Legal Opinion

Fitts v. Mission Health & Beauty Shop

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1922No. Civ. No. 3652PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

In this action the plaintiff brought suit upon seven alleged causes of action. She was made defendant in a cross-complaint. The court rendered judgment in her favor on all except the last count of the complaint and gave her judgment on the issue tendered by the cross-complaint. The appeal is taken from the whole judgment but appellant only urges a reversal of that part of the judgment which was rendered by the court against her on the seventh cause of action alleged in the complaint.

A written agreement was entered into between Stephen Innes, party of the first part, and Lela May Fitts and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bagley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  2. Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Loftus v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ehrman v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Hearst v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bohn v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Brown v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Pemberton v. Ladue Realty & Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Hotle v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. 600 North Frederick Road, LLC v. Burlington Coat FactoryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API