Legal Opinion

Wiener v. Southcoast Childcare Centers, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 2004No. S116358PublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

We granted review in this case to determine whether a child care center and its property owner should be liable in tort for a third party’s intentional criminal act against the center’s children, when there had been no reported prior similar criminal acts or indeed any similar activity on or near the child care premises. As will appear, we conclude that under Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping Center (1993) 6 Cal.4th 666, 678 [25 Cal.Rptr.2d *1142137, 863 P.2d 207] (Ann M.), and its progeny, the center and property owner should not be liable because the criminal act involved here…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Paulsen v. CNF INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Miller v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. McDonald v. Antelope Valley Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Wilson v. 21st Century InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API