Legal Opinion

Burrell v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1937No. Appeal, 240PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The appeal in this workmen’s compensation case is by the employer and its insurance carrier from a judgment entered by the court below upon an award of compensation to the claimant and her dependent daughter.

It is not questioned that Dominic Burrell, claimant’s husband, while in the course of his employment as a hoisting engineer with Inland Collieries Company, died suddenly about nine o’clock on the forenoon of January 11, 1935. The issue was whether his death resulted from the natural and normal progress of the chronic arteriosclerosis, accompanied by high blood…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Flucker v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Watkins v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Samoskie v. Philadelphia & Reading C. & I. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Zelazny v. Seneca Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Royko v. Logan Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Johnson v. Valvoline Oil Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Fetrow v. Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Griffin v. National Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API