Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Finley Rubber Tire Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia
In Equity. Suit for infringement of letters patent No. 554,675, issued to Arthur W. Grant February 18, 1896, for a rubber tire wheel. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, District Judge.
In this case a bill was filed by the Consolidated Rubber Tire Company, the Rubber Tire Wheel Company, and the Munford Rubber Tire Company, complainants, against the Finley Rubber Tire Company, Samuel Everett Finley, J. J. Coulter, and W. D. Hoyt, defendants. The purpose of the bill was to enjoin the infringement by the defendants of patent No. 554,675, issued February 18, 1896, to A. W. Grant, for a rubber tired wheel. The defendants answered the bill, denying that they had in any way infringed said patent, and the defendants J. J. Coulter and W. D. Hoyt disclaimed any…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Cantrell v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Steiner Sales Co. v. Schwartz Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Rubber Tire Wheel Co. v. Milwaukee Rubber Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907
- Eskimo Pie Corporation v. National Ice Cream Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Alliance Securities Co. v. J. A. Mohr & SonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1925
- Schutte & Koerting Co. v. Wheeler Condenser & EngineerIng Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.