Rubber Tire Wheel Co. v. Milwaukee Rubber Works Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff in error began this action to recover royalties on account of defendant’s use, under a license system ■ set forth in the complaint, of patent No. 554,675, issued February 18, 1896, to Grant, plaintiff’s assignor, for an improvement in rubber-tired wheels. The license system was embodied in three papers, Exhibits A, B, and C. That they “were all executed at one and the same time and were intended to constitute and did constitute one agreement” is not open to question, for such is the explicit admission in defendant’s answer. The covenants of defendant must…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Bement v. National Harrow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Patterson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Bloomer v. McQuewanSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Line Material Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State v. Duluth Board of TradeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- General Electric Co. v. Continental Lamp Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- United Shoe Machinery Co. v. La ChapelleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Blount Mfg. Co. v. Yale & Towne Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1909
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.