Legal Opinion
Alliance Securities Co. v. J. A. Mohr & Son
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 25, 1925No. 1280, 1299PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERRIGAN, District Judge.
These are suits brought under Rev. Stats. § 4921 (Comp. St. § 9467), charging infringement of letters patent of the United States No. 1,196,691, for an invention of means for distributing liquids. The maker and seller, the De Vilbiss Manufacturing Company, has assumed the defense and is the real defendant in each case. Plaintiff is the assignee of Blake F. Hopkins, in whose name the patent originally issued. [27]
The defenses which have been set up are invalidity of patent, by reason of the prior art; prior public use; prior invention; want of invention; and fraud and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Monsanto Company v. Rohm & Haas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Alliance Securities Co. v. De Vilbiss Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Avco Manufacturing Corporation and the Harry Alter Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Crosley Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Pennsylvania Research Corp. v. Lescarboura Spawn Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.