Corson v. Berson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Gibson, C.
— This action was brought by plaintiff, Corson, as assignee, to recover from the firm of A. Berson & Son the sum of $1,050, due for rent, for three and one half months, on a lease made and delivered to them by the firm of Ewing, Plum & O’Brien, plaintiff’s assignors. A. Berson & Son admitted, by their answer, that they occupied the leased premises during the period *435above mentioned, but denied that such occupation was under or pursuant to the lease relied upon by plaintiff, and averred that during that time they held under a verbal agreement with Ewing, Plum & O’Brien, by which they,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chester v. . DickersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Hubbard v. . BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Friermuth v. FriermuthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Wolf v. MillsIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Mamlock v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by11 opinions
- Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Pearson v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Owen v. HerzihoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Palmer v. ZeisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Arocena v. SawyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.