Legal Opinion

Arocena v. Sawyer

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 1923No. Civ. No. 4026PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an action to recover for services which plaintiff and his assignors—certain ranch hands—performed for a partnership of which defendant is the surviving member. Judgment passed for plaintiff on four of the assigned claims. Defendant appeals from that judgment and likewise from an order denying his motion for a nonsuit and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. As neither of these last-mentioned orders is appeal-able, the attempted appeals therefrom will be dismissed.

Defendant and one Leopold Alexander had been partners. The partnership", which had been engaged in farming a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Mercantile Trust Co. of S.F. v. DoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  3. Easterbrook v. FarquharsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Manning v. DallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Norton v. LarcoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marc Bellaire, Inc. v. FleischmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. London v. GubermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Schwindt v. Billiwhack Stock Farms, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Burge v. MichaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API