Legal Opinion

Kahn v. Commercial Union Fire Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 7, 1936No. Civ. 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURRENTINE, J., pro tem.

In this ease the defendant issued two policies of fire insurance to plaintiff (1) covering $500 on merchandise consisting principally of meats, and $2,500 on furniture, fixtures and equipment, and (2) one covering $500 on furniture, fixtures and equipment. Loss occurred at the time and in the manner set forth in the facts in the case of Kalin v. Allemannia Fire Insurance Co. (ante, p. 39 [60 Pac. (2d) 149]), this day decided.

The defendant raises the same special defenses in this ease as was raised in Kahn v. Allemannia Fire Insurance Co., and in addition thereto other…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. De MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. People v. TalkingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Rossini v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Kavanaugh v. Franklin Fire Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Miller v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. FriendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Cummings v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. De MartiniCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. American Employers' Insurance v. LindquistDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1942
  5. Firemen's Ins. v. ShowDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API