Legal Opinion

Miller v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 1907No. Civ. No. 347PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Glenn County, and from an order denying a new trial. Wm. M. Finch, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

This is an action on a fire insurance policy. The cause was tried before a jury. A large number of special issues was found in favor of plaintiffs’ contention and the general verdict was for said plaintiffs in the sum of $2,-586.35, the amount covered by the policy being $3,265. Judgment was entered accordingly, from which and from the order denying a motion for a new trial the appeal has been taken.

The main reliance of appellant is upon the defense set out in the answer, to the effect that the insured, H. T. Miller, at the time he made his application for the policy, “willfully and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Claflin v. Commonwealth InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Home Insurance Co. of New York v. MendenhallIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Greiss v. State Investment & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Cavallaro v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Williams v. CasebeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Greco v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Cummings v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Hornblower v. Masonic Cemetery Assn.California Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Pedrotti v. American Nat. Fire Ins. Co., Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Gong v. Firemen's InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API