Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Fire Insurance Exchange

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1988No. B027690PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

Plaintiff Mary L. Cummings, (plaintiff), appeals from a summary judgment granted to defendant Fire Insurance Exchange (defendant), 1 on her complaint seeking damages from defendant for its failure to pay a property damage claim and its allegedly malicious instigation of an unsuccessful criminal prosecution of plaintiff. Because the record demonstrates (1) that plaintiff knowingly and wilfully filed a false claim on a casualty policy issued by the defendant and (2) that defendant had a reasonable basis for believing that plaintiff had violated the law in so doing, we affirm…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Claflin v. Commonwealth InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Williams v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Longobardi v. Chubb Ins. Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  2. Caro v. Procter & Gamble Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. People v. DieguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Mitchell v. United National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Powers v. United Services Automobile Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1999

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API