Legal Opinion

People v. De Moss

California Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1935No. Crim. 3871PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

In an information filed by the district attorney of the county of Merced, the defendant was charged with the murder of Mabel De Moss, his wife. He entered pleas of not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity. The jury brought in a verdict of murder in the first degree without recommendation and a verdict that he was sane at the time of the commission of the offense. Prom a judgment imposing the extreme penalty and from an order denying a new trial, defendant prosecutes this appeal.

The homicide was perpetrated on October 14, 1934, at a time when the parties were estranged. They had been…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. SuesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. People v. TalkingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. People v. BurkhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. KynetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. People v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API