Kavanaugh v. Franklin Fire Ins. Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover for a fire loss upon an insurance policy issued by the defendant corporation May 26, 1915, in San Bernardino. The policy was in the standard form required by our statute (Stats. 1909, pp. 404, 406), which statutory form contained the following provision: “ Unless otherwise provided by agreement endorsed hereon or added hereto, this entire policy shall be void . . . (b) If the interest of the insured be other than unconditional and sole ownership ...” It is required that there shall be printed upon the back of such policy the following: “Read this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- McCollough v. Home Ins. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Allen v. Home Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Sharman v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Waller v. City of New York Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Estate of ReidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Glickman v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Kelley v. American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Capital Glenn Mining Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.