Parrish v. Bradley
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to. superior court of Grand Rapids. (Burlingame, J.) ■Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
It is claimed by the plaintiff that the •defendant came to his office while he was acting as judge •of the superior court of the city of Grand, Rapids, and talked with him in reference to defendant’s interest in a •silver mine at Laramie, in the territory of Wyoming, and •stated that if he (the plaintiff) was not re-elected judge, he wanted him to go out there for the defendant, and look after his silver mining interests. Defendant stated that his intention was to organize a joint-stock company, and wanted plaintiff to open the mine up^ set men at work at it, developing it, and selling stock;…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Babbitt v. BumpusMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Cook v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by3 opinions
- Howey v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Callahan v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- First National Bank v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1900