Legal Opinion

Cook v. Brown

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1886PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to Lenawee. (Howell, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

The action in this case was assumpsit upon the common counts to recover the amount due on a promissory note given by defendant Comfort, on the first day of February, 1883, to the defendant Brown, made payable to *475bim or bearer, for the sum of $500, and interest at 8 per !cent., due February 1, 18S4.1

I About the twenty-sixth of April, 1883, Brown sold the note to the plaintiff, for its full value, and when he transferred it signed the same, placing his name thereon, at the request of the plaintiff, directly under that of Comfort. In this form it was received by the plaintiff, and upon its face…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bank of United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Good v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Mynning v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Dale v. GearSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  5. Wilson v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1843

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Trego v. Estate of CunninghamIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Phelps v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. People v. QuimbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Borden v. Fletcher's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Church v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API