Legal Opinion

Callahan v. City of Port Huron

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1901Published

Error to St. Clair; Thomas, J. Case by John H. Callahan against the city of Port Huron for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment for injuries claimed to have been received by falling on a defective sidewalk. The plaintiff’s testimony was to the effect that the injury occurred while he was walking on the sidewalk, at some little distance from a crosswalk, to which reference was made by the testimony of the defendant’s witnesses. The sole error complained of is the refusal of the court to instruct the jury that, if the plaintiff was riding a wheel at the time he was injured, he could not recover.

There can be no doubt that the defendant was entitled to have this instruction given, if there…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Babbitt v. BumpusMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Parrish v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API