Legal Opinion · Dissent

First National Bank v. Bowen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1900Published

Error to Cheboygan; Shepherd, J. Assumpsit by the First National Bank of Detroit against David Bowen on a promissory note. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1DissentLong, J.

This suit was brought on a promissory note of $500, dated June 29, 1895, due in four months, payable to C. E. Kelsey, and purporting to be signed by the defendant, David Bowen. The defendant pleaded the general issue, and attached thereto an affi davit denying the execution of the note. On the trial he did not in terms deny his signature to the note, but claimed that a $500 note was given by him dated about April 1st, and that he signed it as accommodation maker for Mr. Kelsey. He testified that, if it was the same note as the *282one in suit, the date had been changed. The court below left that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hagan v. Chicago, Detroit & Canada Grand Trunk Junction RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Burroughs v. PloofMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. McDonald v. OrtmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Aldine Press v. EstesMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Parrish v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API