Legal Opinion

People v. McKee

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1995No. B089085PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.

This is a “second strike” case under the new “three strikes” law, yet another complex sentence law overlaying an existing complex sentencing scheme. David McKee pled guilty to four counts of forgery. (Pen. Code, § 470.) He was sentenced to prison for six years, eight months and appeals contending: “I. The trial court erred in imposing consecutive subordinate terms. [U II. The trial court erred by doubling the subordinate terms. . . . [‘jQ III. Using appellant’s prior conviction both to enhance his sentence by doubling the subordinate terms and to mandate consecutive sentences…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. TassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. RayfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. NederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. JeffersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. DelozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. CastelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. People v. BlackburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. People v. IngramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API