Legal Opinion

People v. Deloza

California Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1998No. S061929PublishedCited by 166 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

In this case we consider whether the same analysis used to determine if multiple punishment is permitted under Penal Code1 section 6542 should be used to determine if consecutive sentencing is required by section 1170.12, subdivision (a)(6) and (7) (subdivision (a)(6) and (7)).3 We conclude these analyses are not coextensive, and therefore reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

*589I. Facts and Procedural Background

On November 26, 1995, at approximately 4 p.m., defendant David Deloza and an unidentified armed companion entered the Arroyo Furniture store in Highland Park. The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. ChampionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. LoeunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by166 opinions

  1. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. People v. JeffersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API