Legal Opinion

People v. Ingram

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1995No. F022390PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STONE (W. A.), J.

Defendant Timothy Ingram appeals from a judgment of conviction after a jury found him guilty of two counts of residential burglary (Pen. Code, 1 §§ 459, 460) and the trial court found true allegations he had suffered two prior convictions for residential burglary and had served a prior prison term for possession of stolen property. Because of the two prior residential burglary convictions and the current residential burglary convictions, defendant is subject to sentencing pursuant to the “Three Strikes” law, section 667, subdivisions (b)-(i). The court sentenced…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. DelozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. People v. DotsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API