People v. Martin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, J.
In this case we conclude that a defendant who has suffered a previous conviction for a serious or violent felony and who is convicted of two current felonies must be sentenced consecutively for the current felonies, and that the sentence for each determinate term must be doubled.
Factual and Procedural Summary
This case arises under the “Three Strikes” statute, chapter 12 of the Statutes of 1994. The statute was adopted as an urgency measure, effective March 7, 1994. It makes major changes to Penal Code section 667, 1 adding subdivisions (b) through (i) relating to increased…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. JeffersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. DelozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. DotsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.