Berner v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gunther, J.,
On November 12, 1952, Commonwealth Telephone Company (hereinafter called Commonwealth) filed proposed new tariffs providing for rate increases for local exchange service. On January 5, 1953, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission suspended operation of the proposed rates for a period of six months and instituted an investigation to determine fairness of proposed rates. On June 30, 1953, the suspension was again extended to October 11, 1953, and later, by agreement, extended further to November 10, 1953. *22Complaints against the rate increases were filed by Clyde E.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell Tel. Co. of Pa. v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Solar Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Scranton-Spring Brook Water Service Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Application of Wilmington Suburban Water Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1964
- Berner v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Scranton Steam Heat Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Dauphin Consolidated Water Supply Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- UGI Utilities, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.