State v. Roberson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
'Winborne, J.
The determinative assignment of error on this appeal is based upon defendant’s exception to denial of his motion for judgment as of nonsuit. The exception is well taken.
While it is a general rule of law, adopted in this State, that any person of ordinary intelligence, who has had an opportunity for observation, is competent to testify as to the rate of speed of a moving object, such as an automobile, Hicks v. Love, 201 N.C. 773, 161 S.E. 394; Jones v. Bagwell, 207 N.C. 378, 177 S.E. 170; Tyndall v. Hines Co., 226 N.C. 620, 39 S.E. 2d 828; Brafford v. Cook, 232 N.C. 699, 62 S.E.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Augusta Railway Co. v. GloverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Mitchell v. . MeltsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Tyndall Ex Rel. Tyndall v. Harvey C. Hines Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Hicks v. . Love and Bruton v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dunlap v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. BeckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Wood v. Michigan Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. WilcoxOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Lookabill v. ReganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.