Hicks v. . Love and Bruton v. . Love
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
Tbe record contains eigbty-two assignments of error, nineteen of wbicb relate to evidence tending to sbow tbe speed of tbe Dodge sedan immediately before tbe collision occurred. Subject to tbe defendant’s exception several witnesses wbo saw tbe sedan and at tbe time were impressed by its speed were permitted to express tbeir estimate, some saying that in tbeir opinion it was running at tbe rate of fifty miles an bour and others at a rate not less than sixty.
These exceptions raise tbe question whether tbe court committed error by admitting tbe evidence without requiring preliminary testimony…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Davis v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Jeremiah M. Kesler v. . William A. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- Russell v. Windsor Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Carter v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Carpenter v. Asheville Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Coach Co. v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Greene v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Tyndall Ex Rel. Tyndall v. Harvey C. Hines Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Queen City Coach Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.