Legal Opinion

State v. Becker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1955No. 651PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The defendant’s assignment of error No. 3 challenges the correctness of the ruling .of the court below in refusing to sustain his motion for judgment as of nonsuit interposed at the close of the State’s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence.

As a basis for consideration of the above assignment of error, we have endeavored to set forth a comprehensive and accurate statement of the pertinent parts of the evidence adduced in the trial below.

The result of this accident is indeed regrettable, irrespective of what happens to the defendant. However, his conviction should not be upheld…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. State v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Ingram v. . Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. KickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. State v. PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. State v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. State v. HancockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API