Davis v. Beres
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In 1958, by amendatory Act No 152, the Legislature declared a specific time limitation against the institution of actions provided by our dramshop statute (MCLA §436.22 [Stat Ann 1971 Rev § 18.993]). The limitation read then and reads now:
“Any action shall be instituted within 2 years after the happening of the event.”
On appeal granted (383 Mich 814) to review the decision of Division 2 (Davis v. Beres [1970], 24 Mich App 130), the appellant-defendant avers upon appellee-accepted facts that the instant dramshop action was not instituted or — synonymously—com menced within the time allowed hy…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Platt v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Husted v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Holland v. EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Wayne County Board of Road Commissioners v. Wayne County ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Peck v. German Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Quin Blair Enterprises, Inc. v. Julien Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Ardella Patterson v. Chrysler GroupCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Shepard v. KaylerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985