Holland v. Eaton
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, C. J.
In these 4 cases, consolidated on appeal, plaintiffs appeal from orders granting defendants’ motions to dismiss. The grounds for these motions were that the actions were barred by the 2-year limitation in the Michigan civil damage act 1 on the time within which suits under the act must be brought.
Plaintiff Shirley Holland and the estates of her 3 minor children commenced these actions in Branch circuit court on February 14, 1962, by filing declarations alleging joint and several liability of defendant liquor licensees under the civil damage act, popularly known as the dram shop act, for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Bement v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- White v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Thurston v. PrentissMichigan Supreme Court · 1849
- In Re Quinney's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Millross v. Plum Hollow Golf ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Craig v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Jackson v. PKM CORP.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Lambert v. CalhounMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Duncan v. BeresMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.