Legal Opinion

Ardella Patterson v. Chrysler Group

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 11, 2017No. 16-1365PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.

In this ERISA action brought pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132, 1 Defendants-Appellants, Chrysler Group, LLC, et al. (Defendants), appeal the judgment of the district court ordering them to pay Plaintiff-Appel-lee, Ardella Patterson (Plaintiff), pension and surviving spousal benefits. We reverse, finding Plaintiffs claim barred by the statute of limitations.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff and Henry Lee Patterson wed on February 15, 1987. They divorced on September 27, 1993. The Judgment of Divorce declared that Plaintiff was entitled to one-half of the pension benefits…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Elizabeth Clemons v. Norton Healthcare Inc. Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. Ralph Gragg v. UPS Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  3. Standard Ins. Co. v. Joel Michael Guy, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  4. Trane U.S. Inc. v. NeblettDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
  5. Frongillo v. Bank of STX, inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2026

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API