Legal Opinion
United States v. Ryan, James
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 15, 1987No. 87-1069PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge:
James Ryan appeals from his conviction for making false statements to a federally insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 (1982) (“§ 1014”). In this appeal we must consider 1) whether an arguably true answer to an ambiguous question on a loan application can form the basis of a conviction under § 1014, 2) whether an ambiguous answer to an unambiguous question on a loan application can serve as the basis for a conviction under § 1014, and 3) whether an incomplete answer to a question on a loan application can support a conviction under…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. DanskerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Dale Murray, Paul Leahey, Ronald Vanderbosch, Lawrence Tower, and Linton SherlockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Alvin Frazin, United States of America v. Ronald Mark MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Joe S. Duncan and Michael M. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. HilandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. LeoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.