Legal Opinion
United States v. Hiland
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 19, 1990No. Nos. 89-1222EM, to 89-1224EMPublishedCited by 127 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
Carter-Glogau Laboratories, Inc., now known as Retrae, Inc., Ronald M. Carter, Sr. (Carter), and Larry K. Hiland appeal from judgments of conviction entered by the district court1 following a two-month jury trial. The convictions resulted from the manufacture and distribution of E-Fer-ol Aqueous Solution (E-Ferol), a pharmaceutical product administered intravenously to premature infants. Each of the appellants was convicted on one count of conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, and to violate the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), in violation of 18 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited116 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Crowder, Rochelle A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- John Alvin Payne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Don Phillip DeangeloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.