Legal Opinion

United States v. Wells

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 26, 1997No. 95-1228PublishedCited by 504 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Souter

The principal issue before us is whether materiality of falsehood is an element of the crime of knowingly making a false statement to a federally insured bank, 18 U. S. C. § 1014. We hold that it is not.

I

In 1993, the Government charged respondents, Jerry Wells and Kenneth Steele, with violating and conspiring to violate the cited statute as officers and part owners of Copytech Systems, Inc., a lessor of office copiers for a monthly fee covering not only use of the equipment but any service that might be required. To raise cash, Copytech sold its interest in the income stream from these…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by504 opinions

  1. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2019

499 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API