Legal Opinion

Bronston v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 10, 1973No. 71-1011PublishedCited by 455 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burger

We granted the writ in this case to consider a narrow but important question in the application of the federal perjury statute, 18 U. S. C. § 1621: 1 whether a witness may be convicted of perjury for an answer, under oath, that is literally true but not responsive to the question asked and arguably misleading by negative implication.

Petitioner is the sole owner of Samuel Bronston Productions, Inc., a company that between 1958 and 1964, produced motion pictures in various European locations. For these enterprises, Bronston Productions opened bank accounts in a number of foreign countries; in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Hammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. United States v. SlutzkyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
  5. United States v. Loretta WallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by455 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. MussallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  3. United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  5. State v. ForbesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

450 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API