Legal Opinion

Bliss v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 1978No. TC 77-2882, CA 10017PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

Respondent petitions for reconsideration of our decision affirming a denial of attorney fees. See, Bliss v. Anderson, 36 Or App 559, 585 P2d 29 (1978). The opinion of the court was based upon appellants’ sole reliance on appeal upon ORS 20.096 as the basis for their claim of attorney fees. The petition asserts that appellants rely upon the provisions of the contract between plaintiff and ABA and of the settlement agreement and that the statutory reference was made only as a. means of defining "prevailing party” as used in those contracts. 1 The contract contains this provision:

"Attorney’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bliss v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harris v. CantwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. McGann v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Donaca v. IvallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Millard v. SmedesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Ross v. CagleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API