Legal Opinion

Donaca v. Ivall

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 21, 1980No. 77-4-273, CA 11261PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

Both parties appeal from the judgment of the trial court awarding plaintiffs nominal damages for defendant’s violation of the Declaration of Restriction to which the properties owned by both are subject.

Plaintiffs have lived in their home since 1974 when it was built for them. Defendant purchased a lot across the street from plaintiffs in 1976 and began to build a home on that lot in January, 1977. Much of the property in the area, including defendant’s lot, is hilly and steep. It is desirable, however, because of the view of the Tualatin Valley and coastal range which it affords. Defendant’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ludgate v. SomervilleOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. McMillan v. GoldenOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Dean Vincent, Inc. v. Krishell Laboratories, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Riley v. BoyleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. Rodgers Et Ux v. Reimann Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Prairie Hills Water & Development Co. v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Little Whale Cove Homeowners Ass'n v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Valenti v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. LITTLE WHALE COVE HOMOWNERS v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API