Legal Opinion
Harris v. Cantwell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 21, 1980No. 78-0967 L, CA 14857PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P.J.
Defendant appeals a judgment based on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff in an action for conversion of a semi-tractor. He contends the court erred in not directing a verdict in his favor; in submitting a verdict form to the jury which allowed an award of damages for loss of use of the tractor; and in allowing evidence of the purchase price of the tractor three years prior to the conversion. Plaintiff cross-appeals the denial of his request for attorney’s fees.
In September, 1976, plaintiff purchased the semi-tractor from defendant on contract. The contract set forth a payment schedule, a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dickman v. School District No. 62cOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Hall v. WorkOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Preble v. HannaOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Austin v. VanderbiltOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Bliss v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jack Harris, II v. City of Roseburg, Municipal Corporation, John Miller and Les BergmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Cron v. ZimmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Quality Contractors, Inc. v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. DickensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Cal Worthington v. Robert Lick and Nancy Lick, Individually and Dba Lick Farms and Baker Mill and Grain Company, an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.