Legal Opinion

McGann v. Boyd

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 3, 1993No. 91-0084-L-3; CA A74194PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*411LEESON, J.

Plaintiff brought these claims for misrepresentation in the sale of real property against defendant seller Hoefflin and defendant real estate agent Boyd. The trial court granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment, and awarded them attorney fees. Plaintiff appeals, assigning error to the summary judgment and to the award of attorney fees. Defendants cross-appeal, contending that the award of attorney fees was inadequate. We view the record in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the non-moving party, to determine whether defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Park v. HoffardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Mathies v. HoeckOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Lawrence v. PeelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Wescold, Inc. v. Logan International, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Soursby v. HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Riverview Condominium Ass'n v. Cypress Ventures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Bodunov v. KutsevCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. DK Investment Co., LLC v. Inter-Pacific Development Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Hunt v. GoffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. Hunt v. GoffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API