Legal Opinion

Ross v. Cagley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 12, 1983No. 16-80-05660; CA A23967PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Plaintiff sold a parcel of land to defendants, retaining an adjoining parcel. He subsequently brought this action to have declared his right to continue to use a well on defendants’ parcel. The trial court awarded plaintiff the right to use the well and awarded defendants damages on a counterclaim. The trial court also awarded plaintiff attorney fees, on the authority of a provision in the contract of sale between the parties. It is the award of attorney fees that defendants contest in this appeal.

Plaintiffs amended complaint alleged four different “causes of suit.” The first sought…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Bliss v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Wilson v. MatthewsOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Bliss v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Wilson v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chase v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  2. Relational Systems International Corp. v. CableCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API