Legal Opinion
Ard Ex Rel. Ard v. Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 21, 1963No. 40089PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
This is an action for the recovery of damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in error, a boy of eight. He seeks recovery from the City of Oklahoma City on the theory of an attractive, dangerous condition maintained by the City in Lincoln Park. The City had permitted a fallout shelter to be erected in such park. The door at the entrance way to the underground area was slanted at an approximate angle of 30°. This door was attached by metal hinges and bolts holding same, both of which protruded above the surface of the door.
The petition alleges that plaintiff,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Sapulpa v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Plaza v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Abernathy v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
- City of Tulsa v. WheetleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- St. Francis Drainage District v. AustinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Sept. 11 Property Damage and Business Loss LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Aegis Insurance Services, Inc. v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Young v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975