Young v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Justice:
The present appeal involves the alleged error of a portion of the Court of Appeals opinion which characterized the act of Appellees in maintaining a warning signal device at the intersection of a city street and railroad line as the voluntary performance of a safety measure rather than a governmental function.
For clarity and brevity we will hereinafter refer to Appellee, City of Oklahoma City, as the “City.”
The single issue to be decided is whether the installation and maintenance of the battery-powered warning signal device installed by the City outside the railroad…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Auslander v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- City of Sapulpa v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Dorminey v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Kirk v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Avey v. City of West Paim BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ochoa Ex Rel. Hughes v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Opinion No. 76-159 (1976) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1976