Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Wheetley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 12, 1940No. 28786PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
This action was instituted in the district court of Tulsa county by Pairlee Wheetley, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against the city of Tulsa,’ hereinafter referred to as defendant, wherein plaintiff sought to recover damages from defendant for injuries alleged to have been sustained from falling upon an ice-coated street. The cause was tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $10,310. Defendant has appealed.
It appears that on the 25th day of January, 1937, at about 1 o’clock p. m., plaintiff started to cross Third street on the crosswalk at the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ring v. . City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Hamilton v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- City of Atchison v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Jackson v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Spaur v. City of PawhuskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Moore, Oklahoma, a Municipal Corporation v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Company, a Railroad CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- City of Claremore v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Myers v. City of PalmyraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Williams v. City of BristowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- City of Tulsa v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.